Labels: Angeline and Yee Jen
a cultural- historical attraction that reflects the war crime of the Khmer Rouge
Anh Thu
By , at January 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
By , at January 15, 2010 at 12:57 PM
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
By , at January 15, 2010 at 1:09 PM
cultural-historical attractions, and it makes this place very unique, especially the 'skull map'
Cynthia and Hien
By , at January 15, 2010 at 1:10 PM
Agree that it is a culture-historical attractions.
By , at January 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM
We think that this should be categorized as dark, since it is very depressing and full of sorrow. It is related to death and suffering. We think that is also a cultural-historical attraction it happened a long time ago and it gives the tourists an insight to what happened back then in Khmer Rouge's time.
By , at January 15, 2010 at 1:21 PM
We think that this should be categorized as dark, since it is very depressing and full of sorrow. It is related to death and suffering. We think that is also a cultural-historical attraction it happened a long time ago and it gives the tourists an insight to what happened back then in Khmer Rouge's time.
By , at January 15, 2010 at 1:21 PM
This should be a dark destination which reflects the time of Khmer Rouge which had resulted in the 20,000 death .
By , at January 18, 2010 at 11:00 AM
i agree with mai and terry. And can it also be an education-based tourism (the history of Khmer Rouge's time)?
Angeline
By , at January 18, 2010 at 11:02 AM
Well, i do agree that this museum is a cultural-historical attraction. ^_^
By Miuzzel MHH, at January 18, 2010 at 11:03 AM
it is a cultural-historical attraction as it educates people about the Khmer Rouge's time
By Suhmunyik's ♥, at January 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM
i also agree with the idea that it is a cultural-historical attraction.but can it also be classified as an educational attraction as it is open for everyone so school tours can be made here to learn more especially on history of phnom penh.However,it is kind of morbid to visit but i think it will be very "inspiring"
eleanor
By , at January 18, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Yes, i agree that it is a historical attraction. But culture? If that is an incident that happened in the past,i don't think that it should be counted as a culture, especially when people definitely do not practice that 'culture' now.
By , at January 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM
Yea true. It can also be educational attraction. We can learn more about the people in Cambodia especially the prisoners that used to stay there. It can also teach us the history behind of it.
By , at January 18, 2010 at 11:16 AM
Yes, I think you all have valid points. It is cultural/historical tourism and can be further classified as dark tourism. The two categories are not necessary at the same level. Dark tourism can be a sub-category.
Education tourism is more for students. An example would be a student exchange programme, or "study in America" programme. It could also be an overseas internship in a hospital environment. I wouldn't classify this attraction under education tourism.
By Unknown, at January 18, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Conclusion : historical, dark tourism
By , at January 20, 2010 at 10:29 AM